11/4/2023 0 Comments Legal pranks for revengeIf the jury finds that Colie was responding to a provocation that reasonably arouses fear or anger, then there is no malice under the law.Ĭolie, who has been jailed since his April arrest, testified in his own defense about the fear that Cook’s prank elicited. The charges of aggravated malicious wounding and malicious discharge of a firearm also require the jury to find that Colie acted with malice. “How could the defendant have found that he was reasonably in fear of imminent bodily harm?” “They were playing a silly phrase on a phone,” she said. She said Cook’s prank was bizarre but not threatening. The law requires that Colie reasonably fear that he was in imminent danger of bodily harm, and that he use no more force than is necessary. The prosecutor Eden Holmes said the facts do not support a self-defense argument. There is no pause between the moment he draws the weapon and fires the shot. Colie tries to knock the phone away from his face before pulling out a gun and shooting Cook in the lower left chest. ![]() ![]() In the video, Colie says “stop” three different times and tries to back away from Cook, who continues to advance. The phone broadcasts the phrase “Hey dips – quit thinking about my twinkle” multiple times through a Google Translate app. Cook looms over Colie while holding a cellphone about 6in (15cm) from Colie’s face. The footage shows Cook approaching Colie as he picks up a food order. Jurors saw video of the shooting, which captures the confrontation between Cook and Colie lasting less than 30 seconds. He’s not worried that he’s scaring people. Pouilliard said during Thursday’s closing arguments that his client felt menaced by the 6ft 5in (1.95 meter) Cook during the confrontation, which was designed to provoke a reaction and to draw viewers to Cook’s YouTube channel.Ĭook, Pouilliard said, “is trying to confuse people to post videos. A judge will hear arguments on the issue at a hearing next month.Ĭolie, who has been in custody since his April arrest, will remain incarcerated. He asked the judge to set aside the conviction. The jury then delivered its verdicts at the end of the day.Ĭolie’s defense attorney, Adam Pouilliard, said the conviction on the firearms charge is inconsistent with the law, given Colie’s acquittal on self-defense grounds. The Loudoun county circuit court judge Matthew Snow called the jury back into the courtroom at approximately 3.30pm and urged them to continue deliberations, a standard admonition given to juries that indicate they are deadlocked. ![]() Three hours in, the jury sent out a note saying it was “divided in terms of whether the defendant acted in self-defense”. The verdict came on Thursday after about five hours of deliberation. The 2 April shooting at the food court in Dulles Town Center, about 45 minutes west of the nation’s capital, set off panic as shoppers fled what they feared to be a mass shooting.Ĭolie pleaded not guilty and said he was acting in self-defense. The jury was split on two lesser firearms counts, and decided to convict him on one and acquit him on the other.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |